The Red Circus

Recall of the facts:

Condemned to died for the murder of my daughter Marie Dolorès, 8 years that it had removed and cut the throat of in Marseilles in 1974, Christian Ranucci found guilty and condemned was carried out in July 1976 on the benches of the Guillotine. A few years later, the publication of a book “the red Sweater over”, then of a Film drawn from the manuscript of the writer Gilles Perrault, supports the thesis of the miscarriage of justice and the innocence of Ranucci, showing police force and French justice to have bâclé the file. Showing of all the words the President of the republic of the time Valerie Giscard d’Estaing to have refused the presidential pardon to him. According to certain sources, the ex, lawyer, become writer would be close to the networks extremists of left. (Bond and curriculum vitae vitæ in the texts) the doubt generated by the book becomes at once the standard of the league of the French abolitionists, Robert Badinter in tète, to require and obtain from the French French National Assembly the abolition of the death penalty in France. “With the formula “because a doubt is posed” During more than thirty years, a small fringe of the public opinion will oscillate between these two theses, of which that of the doubt, of the glaring error too often maintained clothing by certain media for which the affair so much with becoming a value on in term of TV rating and for certain journalists, writers in evil of subject, a goodwill of most flourishing. Wearied lira all and his opposite in about fifteen works for the majority badly documented, written with the contempt of the truth, the respect of our private life and the memory of my daughter, after thirty years of silence during which we have whole to support, very understood I decided to face the taboo which seems to be of setting and to make finally public the original documents drawn from the files of the file instruction which formally contradict the thesis of innocence and thus of the miscarriage of justice. I thus decided to put on the public place the penal judgments of this writer for his doubtful lies and its calumnies, to denounce here and put at the day the ashamed handling carried out voluntarily by a “writer” without scruples and his “groupies” which voluntarily has with an only aim of scrambling the spirits with the contempt of the honor of the impartiality truncated the facts and the existing material proofs to give the murderer, using more than 200 arguments voluntary errors, the appearance of a martyr, not hesitating in its manuscript to nail with the pilori, services of police force and justice! By three times, in thirty years the Supreme court of appeal , the highest French jurisdiction will not let itself take with the trap, tended by the writer and his supporters, these revisions mainly drawn from the book, the red Sweater over. In thirty years, never a serious, credible element will be advanced, no element of pled doubt could not be crédibilisé. Robert Badinter, become Minister for the justice of François Mitterrand, who had carried to end of arm and defended the abolition of this sorrow before the Nationale assembly will not make a success of to him either with crédibiliser this thesis, but will take thereafter closely made and causes for the thesis of the “serious” doubt which had durably developed the Perrault novelist. To date, Robert Badinter, become Senator since the loss of his invaluable Morrocan, questioned recently on the doubt of which it is made the cantor, is in impossibility of determining his matter, and of the crédibiliser by the least proof of than it advances. While not being able because of its old functions, to ignore the irrefutable evidence of the criminal responsibility for Ranucci, which appears in the file with load. The author of the novel then built in his work “the doubt” creating a character born of his fertile imagination, an unknown vêtu of a red Sweater over, circulating to commit his crimes in Simca 1100 gray, and approaching his victims systematically, in the search of a black puppy… This “perfect culprit” designated in the book, will make long fire before the court of Sat with the lawsuit Ranucci, the only witness, a woman has to have seen this man, (corresponding to the portrait robot of the book) and who will deposit under oath…. before the Court, will quickly prove to be actually only one poor, but nevertheless true, false witness, to buy at the last minute by the mother of the assassin, whereas they had there, recently linked knowledge, while waiting to enter to the visiting room of the prison of Beaumettes of Marseilles to visit their respective children there. Preceding attempts at removals fallen through children, and the with dimensions proven paedophile of Ranucci make “spot” on the standard of the abolitionists whom Badinter held up a time in front of the French deputies! From where this reserve of the media has what does not burst the naked and raw truth! In addition, if Ranucci were innocent, the state would be recognized as responsible on the most level to have ravaged and Guillotine innocent. What is not the case.